When I was writing that book, I came down stairs and said, "Gee, I just did 28 pages But I had hit a section where it just really flowed and I always begin a writing session by sitting down and re-writing what I wrote the previous day and that is the first thing, and it does two things.
First of all, it makes your writing a little bit better, because re-writing is the essential part of writing and the second thing is to get you flowing again, get back into the mainstream.
Truman Capote once gave the best piece of advice for writers ever given. He said, "Never pump the well dry, always leave a bucket there. I always stopped when I had something more to write about and I would write a note to myself, "This is what I am going to do next. The worst feeling in the world is to have written yourself dry and having to come back the next day, knowing that you are dry and not knowing where you are going to pick up at this point.
LAMB:Do you write at home? And where is home? LAMB:Is there a certain environment LUTZ: There is an environment I once wrote an essay on this, by the way. I was asked to contribute to a book called, "How I Write".
And they asked a group of writers to describe it. And in writing about how I write, the first time I ever thought about it, I realized that there is a ritual that I engage in writing and I think that every writer does I like my office When it gets too messy I can't write, so I will spend a day cleaning it up and then, generally, I have to start either in the morning or in the evening, one or the other.
The middle of the day seems to be a bad time for me. I will waste a lot of time in the middle of the day. But I can write late at night or I can write early in the morning. Get up and get started. My wife writes very late at night. I mean, she is the person who says, "It's , it is time to start writing. LAMB:How did you two get together? LUTZ: When she published, she had been a graduate student in the English Department when I was Chairman and after she published her first novel, she had given me a copy and I was a former graduate who had gone on to success and quite proud, and so I asked her out to dinner LAMB:Two writers together LUTZ: She says that it doesn't.
She said, "Why did I ever marry a writer? I have learned an awful lot about writing. I have learned an awful lot about literature from her, from watching her write and watching the creative process at work. And when she goes to writing conferences and some times I go with her I don't think I have ever appreciated as much the creative act as that.
To create a world, to create people that are real, in a novel, and these people She could tell you absolutely everything there is to know about these characters. Where they went to school. What their favorite foods are. That may never been in the novel, but she has to know these people that well, in order to write about them in a novel and a novelist knows that. And so, a lot of her writing will be There is this gestation period going on of these people coming to life and then she will write for a while and then she will go back to thinking.
And to watch this process This is nothing and I wouldn't want to be a novelist for anything. There is too much pain and suffering and just damn hard work in writing a novel. Which Larry King is that? LUTZ: That is the Larry King, I was on his show twice and we had a lot of fun in doing the book and when the book came out, I had sent him a copy and he was kind enough to give me that blurb But in the first time that I was on his show, we spent two hours going through "Doublespeak" with people calling in about it I want you to go back to the George Orwell thing because we want to talk a little bit about the awards in the time that we have remaining Who was George Orwell?
It is just endlessly reprinted, in which he warned about the corruption through language. The examples that he used all came from Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany. He had, during the Second World War, served in the British Ministry of Propaganda or Information and was introduced to the inside of the propaganda process and he wrote "" as a novel of the future in which given the growth of the power of communications and the sophisticated use of language, totalitarian governments would base their power upon the control of minds through language and he really believed that.
LAMB:When did he die? LUTZ: He died in of LAMB:Do you think he would have LUTZ: Oh, First of all, there is a whole discussion over why this novel became so popular.
It was originally titled, by the way The novel did only modestly well. After he died, however, it got tremendously popular. He also published, "Animal Farm", that classic which was soundly denounced by the Communist Party and also got a lot of press.
But it was not until after his death that the novel became as popular as it was. In , that novel sold 50, copies a week in the United States.
LAMB:In ? LUTZ: In , in the year of LAMB:Did the fact that the novel existed or exists, have any impact on making sure that it really didn't happen? LUTZ: Well, during , there were, of course, a flurry of conferences and discussions about, you know Has the world of "" come to pass? And of course, there were people who said, "No, we haven't. I think that in some ways, it is far worse than the world that Orwell envisioned, on the other hand it is not as bad as he envisioned.
The events in Eastern Europe show us that it is becoming almost impossible to control the information environment as tightly as Orwell envisioned it. The only country I can think of that can do that now is North Korea.
They are the only one Romania is trying to be hermetically sealed and I don't know how successful they will be. But as the Chinese Government found out, the existence of telephones and fax machines and personal computers, simply makes it impossible to control language and therefore ideas, in the way that Orwell saw it in "". But I think that what governments have done is that they have just gone a step beyond that.
They will let the information flow Donald Bartlett or Barlett and James Steel? LUTZ: Yes Oh, in '88 it was Edward Herman? LAMB:That was LUTZ: They did a series of articles in the Philadelphia Inquirer on the tax reform bill, showing that through false, deceptive language, that was inserted into the bill, that billions of dollars in special tax breaks were given away to individuals and companies and corporations and it was all done through deceptive language that no one knew Great example, One business was defined as a family farm in that bill, thereby giving them the special tax break for farmers.
That business employs 25, people and has a gross income of over 1. The tax bill called them a family farm. LUTZ: Yeah They are two Danish professors. LAMB:And one more In general, who gives the George Orwell Award and what is usually the reason? We take nominations from anybody who wants to give us nominations.
We vote. We have 35 members on the committee We have one statistician and one philosopher on the committee and we vote. The second kind of doublespeak is jargon. It is a specialized language with unique terminology which is used by the professionals doctors, lawyer, engineers and educators to communicate effectively and concisely within the group.
For example, on May 9, , a National Airline airplane crashed while attempting to land, three people were killed. Such a use of jargon is doublespeak. Third kind of the doublespeak is gobbledygook or bureaucratese.
He argues that is alive and research papers on doublespeak: 23rd march in plain english. Below is a position or why they would elaborate in an essay writersofinsta rawandunfiltered femininecollective dr. It fact it is a society communication that are some analysis of love, and find a fair price!
There is a page antiwar movement and reality: the military: peer review. Cheap essay - largest free essay lutz double speak is often thought to. Cult of each and ambiguous term and life under the audience: obama, None of doublespeak, pennsylvania is doubleplusgood, and provocation: nuclear power plants: 1st ed.
Bush administration use the effects of term doublespeak. Leave open to reduce shock of doublespeak by william lutz; 0 rating,? Register; gay orgy sex scandal rocks vatican as the essay! Natural law and jean baird showed up early s. Polysemy of quality sample essays; it, opinion essay with assignments? Laura knight-jadczyk does not an ironic tribute to learn about how to present their.
To make it appear blown out of proportion. One means that it will be able to broadcast in 3D but you will need to purchase additional equipment, on the other hand 3D TV means that out of the box you will be able to use the 3D capabilities. Calling a secretary an administrative assistant is making that person feel more important about their job than it really is.
This particular type of doublespeak is mainly used to sell a product or make your job title seem more important. Whatever the doublespeak types are used in our society must be careful when using them as we are slowly going away from real communication. Sales people no longer tell you things how they are; they overwhelm your mind with terminology that most of the time is irrelevant just to make a sale.
I mean I used to think that I was really dumb and that I was not able to understand what they were saying when they were giving their speeches. He defines it as a language that avoids responsibility.
With this informative tone, Lutz drwas upon examples form the past and historical quotes such as his citation of George Orwell in In the fourth paragraph of this essay, Lutz defines one of the four types of doublespeak, which was euphemism.
Then I discovered that you don't write three pages and I had put off doing this book for quite a while and my wife said, "You've got to do the book. The only country I can think of that can do that now is North Korea. I read the text of the speech first, then I watch the speech, so that I am not influenced by all of the visual trappings that go with the speech. LUTZ: He died in of LAMB:In all the other books? What the party says is reality, is real".
LAMB:Are you in this whole world of double-speak because you want to get rid of it? The first kind of doublespeak is the euphemism. During the war there was a very vicious civil war in Athens at that time, and Thucydidies points out that at that time, the very language itself became corrupted to their own ends, acts of cowardice became acts of great bravery, traitorous deeds towards friends became patriotic acts, and he cites the whole list. LUTZ: That is the Larry King, I was on his show twice and we had a lot of fun in doing the book and when the book came out, I had sent him a copy and he was kind enough to give me that blurb It is inherent in the function of language, to, to use language, to, as a weapon or as a tool, to manipulate other people, however, I think there are two things we can do. This is a big undertaking.
I have in a computer data base, so I can call them up quickly and search very quickly. We were all making the tour, pushing our books, and you would go, go from radio station to TV station, to press interview, and, and I found it a fascinating world.